From TAG/Presuppositionalism
P 1 - Theist apologists have resorted to negative, burden-shifting
argumentation by attacking the capacity and ability of their opponents to even
argue by claiming their particular god "owns" that capacity and
ability, i.e., the laws of logic, etc.
P 2 - Theist apologists have resorted to such argumentation
because they inherently recognize that there is no evidence or compelling
arguments to positively prove the existence of their god, or that there are no other
positive reasons to believe in their chosen religion.
P 3 - If any theist
god existed, it would not need such negative argumentation in lieu of theists
offering positive reasons to believe.
Conclusion: Therefore, by the theists' own admission, their god must
not exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment